In the case of 0.12, Group B, 1965 et all sic, libris humbris meta data. Three hundred and sixty two point zero five. Ten.
Report garnered, 10th July 1992, Chad Eastwood. Pertaining to:
The Comprehension of Imperceptible Colours
Notwithstanding. Ultra-violet, infrared, colours which we can see but have not named.
Document 1. Proposal on the outlining of the blank for assessment 1, pertaining to Log 5. Ring for assistance notwithstanding. Blue, as an example, must never be seen. Ibid. Kral.
The argument:
- White light “is composed of” the colours.
- The colours “combine to” result in white light”.
- White is a colour.
- Black is a colour.
- As per point 1, point 2, and point 3, white light combines with the other colours to produce white light.
- As per point 1, point 2, point 3, point 4 and point 5, white light combines with the other colours, and with black, to produce white light.
- Black is the absence of white light.
- As per point 6 and point 7, the absence of white light combines with white light, and the colours to produce white light.
- As per point 1, the colours together is the same thing as white light.
- As per point 8, the absence of white light combines with white light and white light to produce white light.
- White light + white light = white light.
- Therefore, the absence of white light, plus white light = white light.
- White light = light
- As per piont 13, light = white
- As per point 7, the absence of white light = black
- As per point 12, 13 and 14, black + white = white.
- Let black = 1
- let white = 2
- As per point 17 and 18, 1+2 = 1. But this is not true.
- Either 0 + 1 = 1 or white light + white light = white light
- As per point 20, either Black does not exist or black is white.
- Black exists.
- As per point 21, black is white.
